• Home
  • About me
  • My Privacy Policy

Did Sen. Sotto copy from 5 bloggers?

August 16, 2012

Share:
Facebook0
Twitter0
LinkedIn0
Google+0

He told Karen Davila, “Why should I quote a blogger?”

Exclusive by Raïssa Robles

copyTwo commenters named alana lillium  Vincent D. Bautista and Miguel Syjuco have found other instances of copying made by Senator Vicente Sotto in his speech yesterday August 15. My thanks to their quick eyes.

Alana Vincent noted that Senator Sotto copied a passage from the blog thetruthofcontraceptives

Miguel also found what Alana Vincent did. Plus, he found two other blogs from which Senator Sotto had copied portions word for word. These are talkingsense by Marlon C. Ramirez and  feministsfor choice.

This morning, when Senator Sotto was asked by ABS-CBNNews anchor Karen Davila whether he had copied from the blog thehealthyeconomist.com in his August 13 speech, he had replied:

Pareho kaming pinagkunan. I’m quoting Natasha Campbell McBride. Why should I quote a blogger?

He’s right you know.

He did not quote from a blogger. He quoted from FOUR FIVE bloggers.

CORRECTION AND UPDATE as of 4:01 PM, August 16, 2012

First, Alana has just sent word that the credit for finding the blog should not go to her but to Vincent D. Bautista. She merely wrote about Vincent’s finding. 

Second, Sen. Sotto copied from FIVE bloggers.

A commenter named Diego has found another blog from which Sen. Sotto copied the following passage in red:

While Sanger claimed she merely wanted to pay her respects and give a personal tribute to Gandhi, she coveted nothing less than his endorsement of the widespread use of artificial birth control methods. Gandhi firmly stood by his belief that the spiritual bonds of marriage are strengthened by sexual abstinence. He thus completely rejected Sanger’s plea for contraception as a tool to control population growth, fearing it would lead to an increase in non-procreative sex, which he viewed as immoral lust.

Diego correctly pointed out that the passage came from the blog of New York University. The words in red are those that Sen. Sotto’s speech lifted:

While Sanger claimed she mainly wanted to pay her respects and give a personal tribute to Gandhi, she coveted nothing less than his endorsement of birth control. Gandhi promoted the spiritual bonds of marriage, which, he argued, were strengthened by continence. He reluctantly agreed to consider sanctioning the safe period or rhythm method, but rejected Sanger’s plea for contraception to control population growth, fearing it would lead to an increase in non-procreative sex, which he viewed as immoral lust.

This is what Alana Vincent and Miguel found out.

I don’t know who the four bloggers are. [Update: Now there are FIVE bloggers from whom Sen. Sotto copied.] Perhaps somebody can give me more details. But the fact is, Sen. Sotto did not acknowledge in his speech that he lifted from their blogs, although he used the same exact words they did. Thus, he gave the impression that he wrote everything and all those thoughts and careful crafting of words came from him.

UPDATE as of 4:30 PM, August 16, 2012

The blogger of the healthyhomeeconomist found out pretty quickly that a Philippine senator lifted from her website. Here’s what she post 13 hours ago. Thanks @peanut and @pimplepopper on Twitter for giving me the heads up on this:

copy

 

Sen. Sotto is probably going to say, why quibble over a few words – 345 words to be exact. [Those are what alana Vincent and Miguel have found so far. There may be more.] The 345 words are a mere 7% of his 4,760-word speech.

That’s not much.

But we’re not speaking of volume here, but of thought.  And intellectual honesty.

Could I be wrong?

Well, don’t take my word for it. Look at the similarities yourself.

Below, I have listed FIVE INSTANCES of his copying word for word, as noted by Miguel and Alana Vincent.

Some supporters of the senator would probably say they find nothing wrong in such copying. It’s done all the time. Words aren’t covered by copyright.

If you notice, though, what Senator Sotto did is the same thing that CNN’s Fareed Zakaria was recently accused of. Zakaria had the decency to apologize and he was suspended by CNN and Time magazine. You can read more about Zakaria’s case here.

Perhaps Senator Sotto did not mean to copy and paste. Perhaps an aide did this for him. Or perhaps someone else fed it to him and he trusted the source completely. Or perhaps one of the bloggers was even his friend.

However, all those copied words became Senator Sotto’s very own when they were officially entered into Senate records.

Below are the instances of copying. I have highlighted the words that he lifted in red. 

ONE – From Sen. Sotto’s speech:

Sanger was so intent on reducing family size that she seemed to not stop even at abortion. Many believe that under the right circumstances, Sanger would have condoned infanticide. Indeed she wrote in her book Woman and the New Race: “The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
This comes from the woman who formed the philosophical base for IPPF.

Copied from Talking Sense by Marlon C. Ramirez:

Breaking Up the Family

Since Margaret Sanger began spreading her ideas about recreational sex and contraception (with babies optional) divorce rates have climbed steadily. When she began her work in 1915, it was standard for married couples to work through their times of difficulty, rather than leave each other. But as her message of hedonism and promiscuity penetrated deeper into society, more and more marriages broke up. Sanger was so intent on reducing family size that she seemed to not stop even at abortion. Many believe that, under the right circumstances, Sanger would have condoned infanticide. Indeed, she wrote in her book Woman And the New Race: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” This comes from the woman who formed the philosophical base for Planned Parenthood.

 

TWO – From Senator Sotto’s  speech:

You can also see that her interest in birth control was not just due to some humane concern for health of women (which birth control doesn’t help anyway), but was driven in part by her desire to encourage women to engage in sex without having children.

But there was even a darker side to Margaret Sanger: a side that IPPF people try to cover up or explain away. That was her belief in “eugenics.” Eugenics is defined as “the application of the laws of hereditary to physical and mental improvement, especially of the human race.”

To Sanger this meant the systematic elimination (through birth control, including abortion) of all those people she and her cohorts considered to be of “dysgenic stock” in order to create a race of superior intellectuals. Ito na rin po yung tinatawag na eugenics–if you are weak, useless, uneducated and poor, you have no right in this world. Sa medaling salita, ang gusto mangyari ng konsepto na eugenics ay ang magkaroon ng birth control para ang matitira na lamang sa mundo ay ang lahing na superior at intelektwal.

Copied from Talking Sense by Marlon C. Ramirez:

But there was another side of Margaret Sanger; a side that Planned Parenthood people try to cover up or explain away. That was her belief in eugenics. Eugenics is defined as “the application of the laws of heredity to physical and mental improvement, especially of the human race.” To Sanger this meant the systematic elimination (through birth control, including abortion) of all those people she and her cohorts considered to be of “dysgenic stock” in order to create a race of superior intellectuals.

 

THREE – From Senator Sotto’s speech:

Sanger also attempted to unduly influence Mahatma Gandhi to adhere to her distorted principles. Fortunately, Sanger’s attempts to do so proved futile. The two activists met in December of 1936 when Sanger traveled to India to speak with Gandhi about birth control, population and the plight of women in India. At that time, Sanger staunchly advocated the global use of artificial contraceptives and, in order to make the acceptance of such contraceptives easier to the Indian populace, sought to make Gandhi an ally. While Sanger claimed she merely wanted to pay her respects and give a personal tribute to Gandhi, she coveted nothing less than his endorsement of the widespread use of artificial birth control methods. Gandhi firmly stood by his belief that the spiritual bonds of marriage are strengthened by sexual abstinence. He thus completely rejected Sanger’s plea for contraception as a tool to control population growth, fearing it would lead to an increase in non-procreative sex, which he viewed as immoral lust.

Copied from feministsforchoice.com:

I recently read an article about the correspondence and meeting between two of the most independent thinkers of the 20th Century, Margaret Sanger and Mahatma Gandhi. The two activists met in 1936 when Sanger traveled to India to speak with Gandhi about birth control. By that time Sanger was advocating internationally for artificial contraceptives and sought to make Gandhi an ally.

 

FOUR – From Senator Sotto’s speech:

Despite the fact that the movement was gaining popularity in a society with a serious poverty crisis, Gandhi was an outspoken critic of artificial birth control. His general attitude was that

“Persons who use contraceptives will never learn the value of self-restraint. They will not need it. Self-indulgence with contraceptives may prevent the coming of children but will sap the vitality of both men and women, perhaps more of men than of women. It is unmanly to refuse battle with the devil.”

Copied from feministsforchoice.com:

Despite the fact that the movement was gaining popularity in a society with a serious poverty crisis, Gandhi was an outspoken critic of artificial birth control. His general attitude was that

“Persons who use contraceptives will never learn the value of self-restraint. They will not need it. Self-indulgence with contraceptives may prevent the coming of children but will sap the vitality of both men and women, perhaps more of men than of women. It is unmanly to refuse battle with the devil.”

FIVE – From Senator Sotto’s speech:

In fact, in a study undertaken by Raymond Pearl, a John Hopkins professor and noted authority on this matter, wrote: “Those who practice contraception as part of their sex life, by their own admission, resort to criminally induced abortions about three times as often proportionately as do their comparable non-contraceptor contemporaries.”

Also in a report prepared for the Royal Commission on Population in Great Britain found that the incidence of induced abortion as a percentage of all pregnancies was nine times higher for women using contraceptives than for women not using birth control.

Copied from thetruthofcontraceptives.blogspot.ca

-In 1939, Raymond Pearl, a Johns Hopkins professor and noted authority, wrote: “Those who practice contraception as part of their sex life, by their own admission, resort to criminally induced abortions about three times as often proportionately as do their comparable non-contraceptor contemporaries.”

-In Great Britain, in 1949, a report prepared for the Royal Commission on Population found that the incidence of induced abortion as a percentage of all pregnancies was nine times higher for women using contraceptives than for women not using birth control.

_______________________________________

Related Stories

Senator Sotto endorsed family planning two years after the death of his son

Did Sen. Sotto just lie on national TV?

Part 2 of Sen. Sotto’s anti-RH speech

Sen. Vicente Sotto’s speech against RH

 

Tagged With: Reproductive Health (RH) bill, Senator Vicente Sotto III and plagiarism

Comments

  1. travel philippines says

    February 18, 2013 at 9:46 PM

    copya gaya style XD

  2. Louie says

    August 24, 2012 at 2:22 PM

    Aside from plagiarism. Sotto cited this debunked source:

    (Source: Cardiovascular Birth Defects and Antenatal Exposure to Female Sex Hormones by Olli P. Heinonen, M.D., M.SC., Dennis Slone, M.D., Richard R. Monson, M.D., Ernest B. Hook, M.D., and Samuel Shapiro, M.B., F.R.C.P.)

    This study has been debunked:

    http://www.ieonline.com/cgi-bin/xFer/cg7t458r/quosa/3371641.pdf

    We believe that the data examined from the relevant groups clearly show that there was no statistically significant association betweenexposure to female sex hormones in the critical organogenic period of pregnancy and cardiac malformations in the offspring.

    http://www.glowm.com/resources/glowm/cd/pages/v6/v6c037.html?SESSID=qv78t1mrbh4bjt60gdjpk18fh3

    The conclusions of Heinomen and associates10,11 were questioned. Wiseman and Dodds-Smith12 reevaluated original data from the US Collaborative Perinatal Project and found several shortcomings. Wiseman and Dodd-Smith12 concluded that no significant association between hormone use and cardiac anomalies existed in the US Collaborative Perinatal Project data.

    • Rowena A. Burden, M.D. says

      August 24, 2012 at 2:42 PM

      there isn’t a part of his speeches that isn’t an outright lie, based on ancient data or dubious references, or cherry-picked from otherwise respected sources… plagiarism is just one of his many sins…

  3. Akinpinoy says

    August 22, 2012 at 11:30 PM

    magsosorry na ata.

    • raissa says

      August 23, 2012 at 6:34 AM

      hindi. Sabi niya – so sue me.

  4. Recalcitrant Nomad says

    August 20, 2012 at 7:31 AM

    I agree to what others posted here. Instead of denying it before sana they (him/staff/writer) admitted it na lang that they plagiarized para tapos ang usapan. Napahaba pa yung issue and embarrassment nila. I’ve been reading several articles about this issue in news sites and blogs today. One thing I noticed sa lahat is laging may Joanne Velasco and Heart Mercado na nagcomment [READ: DEFEND] about Sen.Sotto. They’ve been commenting sa ibang bloggers. I have no idea who they are hindi naman siguro trolls. I just find it weird.

    • scrEaMing mANgo says

      August 20, 2012 at 8:45 AM

      Crowd control most probably, or members of the so-called intelligence pool headed by Villacorta.

  5. scrEaMing mANgo says

    August 18, 2012 at 10:52 AM

    Now this has got to be the most , well written dissection of a current issue worthy of reading over and over. I am not much of a blogger, maybe not even one iota of a good one, but I do read them. Sotto has been known to write such beautiful songs, but what he really earned from was the rip-offs. But it was all for fun. And he never apologized for it. But the idea that his research staff, headed by none other than a lawyer, had the gall to dismiss the blog(s) as mere resource materialscame off as tacky. Tto have used these passages without even giving credit where due, just smacks of arrogance. It’s simple arrogance. If he thinks he is right in contesting the RH Bill, the logical thing would be to write the speech himself, the research staff could have supplied him with facts, and he could have told them in his own words.

    • leona says

      August 18, 2012 at 4:43 PM

      With the plagiarize sections by SOTTO or also by his “stuffs” in RED color, he is now a RED HERRING! in the Senate. We all know what this means.

      • scrEaMing mANgo says

        August 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM

        To think he was against piracy, no?

  6. xander carreon says

    August 18, 2012 at 2:02 AM

    Ito ay nagpapakita lamang na hindi nang-gagaling sa puso no Tito Sotto ang kanyang mga sinasabi at ang kanyang damdamin ay hindi para talaga sa taong bayan kundi pa-pogi points lang at para sabihin ng mga nakikinig or nanunuod sa speech niya na siya ay talagang nagmamalasakit para sa mga kababaihan.

    Tama yung isang nag comment na balik na lang si Tito Sen sa Eat Bulaga.

    • leona says

      August 18, 2012 at 4:50 PM

      Mayroon isang matandang lalaki (RIP) nag sabi na “Pag ang isang lalaki ay mayroon MAKAPAL ‘o BALBON NA BIGOTE, parang NAKA BANG-NGA (sic) NG ISANG DAGA !”
      {maybe trimming moustaches more looks better…Errol Flynn, Clark Gable, atbpa}

      Tama ka…@xander…PA POGI lang…with or without the bigote.

    • vander anievas says

      August 23, 2012 at 10:00 AM

      “nagmamalasakit para sa mga kababaihan”,

      pinagmalasakitan din kaya niya si pepsi paloma?

  7. Tori says

    January 9, 2015 at 6:33 PM

    It’s always a pleasure to hear from someone with exesetipr.

« Older Comments

Trackbacks

  1. raissa robles | Dear US bloggers: Remember how Sen. Sotto challenged you to sue him for plagiarism? Here’s how… says:
    October 2, 2012 at 3:18 PM

    […] Did Sen. Sotto copy from 5 bloggers? […]

  2. Zerothreetwo says:
    September 6, 2012 at 3:13 PM

    […] Did Sen. Sotto Copy from 5 Bloggers? […]

  3. raissa robles | Facebook told me – my posting Sotto anti-RH speech violates FB “community standards” says:
    August 26, 2012 at 6:19 PM

    […] Did Sen. Sotto copy from 5 bloggers? […]

  4. Philippines: Senator Accused of Plagiarism :: Elites TV says:
    August 25, 2012 at 9:08 PM

    […] There are other instances of plagiarism in the speech, according to a journalist who wrote that the senator may have copied from five bloggers. […]

  5. Philippines: Senator Accused of Plagiarism · Global Voices says:
    August 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM

    […] There are other instances of plagiarism in the speech, according to a journalist who wrote that the senator may have copied from five bloggers. […]

  6. Sotto's anti-RH speech copied from US blogger who writes about recipes - Page 2 says:
    August 20, 2012 at 7:43 AM

    […] Actually, it's not just Sarah Pope daw. He or his ghostwriter copied from 5 bloggers. He didn't just quote from 1 blogger, may 4 others pa. My friend told me about it sa post ni Raisa Robles in her site. raissa robles | Did Sen. Sotto copy from 5 bloggers? […]

  7. Senator Sotto also plagiarized his second RH speech | Pinoy Showbiz Entertainment Portal says:
    August 19, 2012 at 10:59 PM

    […] Journalist Raissa Robles, a blogger for ABS-CBNnews.com, noted that a total of five instances of plagiarism were found in Sotto’s second RH speech, citing observations made by Syjuco and Internet user Vincent Bautista. […]

  8. UP students call for Sotto’s resignation over plagiarism | Bukluran UP System's Official Website says:
    August 19, 2012 at 9:56 PM

    […] from Sarah Pope who condemned the senator’s plagiarizing of her blog, Sotto reportedly plagiarized four other blogs. Pope, though against the use of contraceptive pills, expressed her […]

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist Then they came fof the Trade Unionists, and I did not out speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me— And there was no one left to speak for me. —Martin Niemöller (1892-1984)

Subscribe to raissarobles.com

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from raissarobles.com:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

This blog uses MailChimp as a mass mailing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to MailChimp but only for processing. Learn more about MailChimp's privacy practices here.

Christopher “Bong” Go is a billionaire – Duterte

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NmX1Px57cI

Find more of my articles by typing here:

My Stories (2009 – Present)

Cyber-Tambayan on Twitter:

Tweets by raissawriter

Copyright © 2021 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Decline Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.