• Home
  • About me
  • My Privacy Policy

Inside Philippine politics & beyond

US and China: Two contrasting ways of getting rich

November 9, 2012

Share:
Twitter0
Facebook0
LinkedIn0
Pinterest0

Exclusive

By Raïssa Robles

This week I learned the stark contrast between the US and China – between western style democracy and Chinese style socialism.

The US elected a new state leader in a democratic exercise conducted across the country that was noisy, almost chaotic and messy.

Voting in the US.

China is now being introduced to a new leader in a highly exclusive, closed-door gathering of over 2,000 men and women – in a congress conducted with pomp and solemnity, that is almost robotic and elaborately choreographed.

No voting in China. Instead, a “congress” by the only political party.

Running for re-election after a four-year term, America’s President Barack Obama emphasized the “you” – the individual – as the ingredient that makes democracy work. Listen to the end portion of his final campaign speech below:

In contrast, while stepping down from office after 10 years at the helm, Chinese President Hu Jintao emphasized “the people”, the “party” and “the system”.

I don’t have a copy of his 12,574-word speech (at least according to the BBC or British Broadcasting Company network). But the BBC uploaded a “word cloud” of his speech in Beijing, China, based on an English translation. It shows the most recurring words in his speech. Here is a copy below:

I also listened in fascination to the live BBC coverage of outgoing President Hu Jintao’s speech, while someone gave a near simultaneous translation into English. I noticed that the word “system” kept recurring in his speech. Hu Jintao also repeated several times the phrase “socialism with Chinese characteristics” to describe China’s model of development.

My newspaper, South China Morning Post, had additional interesting details about Hu Jintao’s speech in China. It quoted him as saying the following:

We have held high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics and rejected both the old and rigid closed-door policy and any attempt to abandon socialism and take an erroneous path… [or the] evil route of changing its color.

***

As long as we remain true to our ideals and are firm in our conviction, we will surely complete the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects when the party celebrates its centenary and turn China into a modern socialist country that is prosperous, strong, democratic, culturally advanced and harmonious when the People’s Republic marks its centenary [in 2020].

***

On the basis of making China’s development much more balanced, co-ordinated and sustainable, we should double its 2010 GDP and per capita income for both urban and rural residents [by 2020].

While China talks of doubling economic growth for its 1.3 billion population, the US – with 311 million people – is now trying not to fall of a “fiscal cliff”.

In both exercises, both leaders practically gave the same promises: a richer country and a better life to the many.

China vs. the US: Which has the better approach?

Which manner of development will succeed in the long run?

One that emphasizes the individual and the free market like the US? Or one that does the complete opposite like China?

Will China’s 538 million Internet users be able to sway their top leaders to listen more to ordinary voices?  In other words, to be more democratic in their approach to development?

Ironically, Obama is being called “a communist” by some quarters while China is being branded a “capitalist”.

Do labels really matter if the system works to improve people’s lives and they welcome the change?

How about the Philippines?

This brings me to our country. Like China, can the Philippines also evolve its own brand of democracy with “Filipino characteristics”?

It’s doing that, but oh so slowly.

Who can recall the fact that 26 years ago in 1986, a Philippine labor minister named Augusto “Bobbit” Sanchez had to be removed from his post because the military branded him a “communist” for daring to propose that private companies undertake profit-sharing schemes for its workers?

Today, profit-sharing is done by a number of Philippine companies.

Last year, no one called President Benigno Aquino III a “communist” for encouraging more profit-sharing during an employers’ conference. Nor did the employers walk out on his speech but instead had their picture taken with Aquino afterward. Here’s the story about Aquino’s appeal.

What I’m trying to say is, let’s not be afraid to evolve our own brand of democracy. Let’s not crucify future innovators who dare to draw from concepts alien to what we hold dear.

Tagged With: Barack Obama, China transition, democracy and socialism, former Philippine Labor Minister Augusto "Bobbit" Sanchez, Hu Jintao, US election

Comments

  1. bebotsky says

    January 6, 2013 at 1:57 PM

    Hi Raissa, not sure if you have seen this link…

    https://www.facebook.com/ControversialFiles

    Cheers

    • raissa says

      January 6, 2013 at 6:18 PM

      Thanks for showing it to me.

      It’s a potpourri

  2. duquemarino says

    November 27, 2012 at 8:14 AM

    @CPMers

    What is your take on this?

    “Beijing’s S. China Sea rivals protest passport map”

    “Inside the passports, an outline of China printed in the upper left corner includes Taiwan and the sea, hemmed in by the dashes. The change highlights China’s longstanding claim on the South China Sea in its entirety, though parts of the waters also are claimed by the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Brunei and Malaysia.”

    “…….the act of including them in its passports could be seen as a provocation since it would require other nations to tacitly endorse those claims by affixing their official seals to the documents.”

    The Philippines (strongly protesting against the image) and Vietnam (demanding that Beijing remove the “erroneous content”) have sent diplomatic notes to the Chinese embassy in their respective countries.

    China’s TACIT BULLYING!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Mel says

      November 27, 2012 at 6:48 PM

      Not much any non mainland Chinese can do about the new design.

      Phils’. DFA and Bureau of Immigration and Deport ‘them’ should provide a flier insert to incoming Chinese arrivals. The flier’s content info detailing the Phils.’ archipelago’s EEZ boundary lines without China’s 9 dotted lines in the West Phil. Sea or South China Sea.

      Or stamp a BID ‘Misprint’ on top of that page!

      —

      – http://www.interaksyon.com/article/48747/philippines-to-process-chinese-visa-applications-despite-passport-protest

      – http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/international/vietnam-refuses-to-stamp-new-chinese-passport/article4140091.ece

      – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20491426

      – http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/24/india-china-passport-diplomatic-row

      – http://news.msn.com/world/india-and-china-make-their-marks-on-disputed-passports

  3. duquemarino says

    November 27, 2012 at 7:43 AM

    @CPMers

    How come the local media seem not to go behind President Aquino in his position during the recent ASEAN summit.

    Part of an article from Rappler (11.19.12) stated:

    “Cambodia, the chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), said that all 10 members of the bloc had agreed at a leaders’ summit Sunday not to “internationalize” their disputes over rival claims to the South China Sea.

    The apparent deal would have been a victory for China, which has long insisted that countries such as the Philippines should not seek support from the United States.

    But President Benigno Aquino III insisted he and one other country, which diplomats said was Vietnam, had not agreed and that Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen should not have promoted the alleged ASEAN “consensus.”

    Now, China is branding PNoy as “bastos” for standing up against what Cambodia has said about not “internationalizing” the dispute.

  4. Mel says

    November 25, 2012 at 12:44 PM

    “Do labels really matter if the system works to improve people’s lives and they welcome the change?” – RR

    Consider The Tapeworm Economy.

    In layman’s terms, Former Assistant Secretary of Housing under George H.W. Bush and Wall Street Executive/Entrepreneur Catherine Austin Fitts explains how.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP6rny-E1Cw&feature=player_embedded

  5. Mel says

    November 23, 2012 at 12:56 PM

    “We are borrowing money from China to build weapons to face down China,” – Chairman of the (US) Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen.

« Older Comments
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist Then they came fof the Trade Unionists, and I did not out speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me— And there was no one left to speak for me. —Martin Niemöller (1892-1984)

Subscribe to raissarobles.com

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from raissarobles.com:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

This blog uses MailChimp as a mass mailing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to MailChimp but only for processing. Learn more about MailChimp's privacy practices here.

Christopher “Bong” Go is a billionaire – Duterte

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NmX1Px57cI

Find more of my articles by typing here:

My Stories (2009 – Present)

Cyber-Tambayan on Twitter:

Tweets by raissawriter

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Decline Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT