Exclusive
By Raïssa Robles
I received an invitation this morning to watch some naked young men run.
It amused me no end. It’s the first time I recall seeing such an invitation extended to foreign news correspondents.
The invite said:
Hi all,
You are invited to witness and cover the UP Alpha Phi Omega Oblation Run tomorrow, Dec. 14, 11:30 am at the College of Arts and Sciences, Palma Hall, UP Diliman, Quezon City.
The fraternity obviously believes that the idea of seeing some men cavort inside a state university without any clothes on is something newsworthy for the foreign wires.
It is – if it’s a slow news day and probably because Philippine society continues to frown on nudity and to sell Penthouse magazines surreptitiously.
The Oblation Run in UP started as a fraternity prank over 40 years ago at a time when streaking – or the act of disrobing while running – became a fad in the United States.
The thinking was – if UP could have the statue of a naked young man as an icon, then surely male students could follow suit (or without a suit).
I saw for myself an Oblation Run when I was a student in UP. All I could remember was a blur of naked butts zooming past me. I remember some of my male classmates were highly embarrassed by it.
The Oblation Run has been called “obscene” by at least one former Philippine senator. Aquilino Pimentel, Jr., who never went to UP, branded it a “blatant display of male genitals” and a “wanton disregard of the rules of decent society” that discriminated against women.
Probably in response to Pimentel’s criticisms, a handful of women have joined the run.
No one has yet gone to court to stop an Oblation Run.
I suggest that if anyone wants to do this, the easier route would be to approach Vice President Jejomar Binay who is now regarded as the Grand Panjandrum of the Alpha Phi Omega fraternity.
I highly doubt, though, that Binay can do anything about it nor would he want to do something about it.
You see, the Oblation Run is held inside UP’s Diliman Campus and UP is governed by its own charter and now has a long tradition of upholding free expression. The naked display of family jewels is one of the highest forms of free expression in the country today. Those who don’t agree with the Oblation Run don’t have to look. Period.
UP was not always this tolerant of free expression.
Sometime in the 1920s, UP kicked out a young man who had dared to publish an erotic poem. It was about coconuts. At least, this was what my fiction writing professor Francisco Arcellana said.
Judge for yourself if that student deserved to be forced out of the campus for writing this long before the UP Oblation was sculpted by Guillermo Tolentino:
The coconuts have ripened,
They are like nipples to the tree.
(A woman has only two nipples,
There are many women-lives in a coconut tree.)
Soon the coconuts will grow heavy and full:
I shall pick up one…many…
Like a child I shall suck their milk,
I shall suck out of coconuts little white songs:
I shall be reminded of many women.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I shall kiss a coconut because it is the nipple of a
woman.
That 17-year-old student who wrote this exuberant coconut poem was Jose Garcia Villa – probably the most internationally well-known Filipino poet in English today.
Villa dared to write about sex at a time when sex was a taboo subject. It still is, even now.
Here is another Villa poem that sings about procreation:
Now lies she quiet, quiet,
Like moonlight by him.
Quiet. Quiet. Knowing
His jewels are in her.
Quiet. Quiet. Knowing
He is quiet but will
Arise again. Quiet. Quiet.
But he will arise again.
Especially one that, in the words of the Reproductive Health Senate version, is “safe and satisfying”:
Curve of gold above her
In the golden night,
Seventeen times I rose
Creating our child.Seventeen kisses she gave me
In that golden night,
Seventeen times I rose
Creating our child.Seventeen times I sang her
In that golden night,
Seventeen times I rose
Creating our child.Seventeenth lift of gold,
Seventeenth fall of love,
in her golden soil
Sown sweet our child.
Philippine society, however, was not prepared to appreciate Villa’s poetry. He was hauled to court on the charge of obscenity and made to pay ONE PESO.
Today, Villa’s poems would probably be published by glossies like the local editions of Cosmo,Playboy and FHM. Not that they’d pay him much but they would publish him.
What has changed?
Has Philippine society become decadent? More tolerant? Or more open to rebellion?
In 2008, the local edition of Playboy was launched in Manila. Senior Catholic clerics said they were “likely” to seek a ban of this magazine because it “could add to the degeneration of our sexual culture.” The threat was never carried out, though.
Villa’s erotic poetry was a kind of rebellion against those who regarded sex as dirty and a chore to be quickly done with. Much like planting rice is never fun.
I therefore found it truly significant that 11 senators recently voted to retain the phrase “safe and satisfying sex life” in the Reproductive Health Bill over the objections of six other senators.
Villa was born in 1908 – over a hundred years ago.
Despite the vast gap between now and when he wrote his poetry, his poems continue to sing with the audacity and irreverence of youth. Consider his poem about saints:
All saints are naked (how
terribly true) they sit ongrass and play with mice
(how terribly, terribly nice)All saints are naked (how
terrible wicked) they siton grass and play with mice.
Delight is such a little termfor such a lovely view!
Villa’s playfulness, however, masked a quite serious contemplation of God, and of man’s relationship with Him. Consider, for instance, this poem:
With every word, with every thought
With every act,
Besmirched I God;
But he, to counteractCame down to calm the cruel mouth
And kiss the rebel brow,
And said not a word,
Nor loud, nor low!And kissed once more the rebel brow,
In Godhood’s mystery.
But I, where God touched me,
O frantic! sought immediate cautery.
nene says
Here’s someone’s “Naked Truth” on some of those congressmen/women who voted NO invoking religion, GOD and stupidity on their vote. Hail to them!
– Alcover votes “double no. We believe this bill is an evil bill.” (IKAW NA TALAGA ANG EVIL! IISA LANG ANG BOTO MO, GAGAWIN MONG DALAWA? MANDADAYA KA NA SA BOTO E WALA PA ANG ELEKSIYON. DEMONYO!)
– Almario votes no. “I’d like that in my lifetime we will have countries with Filipinos & Filipinize the world.” (HITLER, IKAW BA ‘YAN? NEO-NAZI LANG DRAMA MO? WORLD DOMINATION AGAD-AGAD?)
– Antonino votes no: Without our population, we would not have large remittances. I believe #RHbill is not good for our country, our population. (IKAW NA ANG MUKHANG PERA! REMITTANCE PALA NG OFW ANG BASEHAN MO! MUKHANG PERA!)
– Bagasina votes no, says her vote not influenced by the Church. “Marami po ang may gusto na wag isulong ang #RHbill. Live and let live.” (MAS MARAMI YATA KAMI NA GUSTONG ISULONG ANG RH BILL. GUSTO MO PA NG PARAMIHAN?)
– Bagatsing votes no. “From the beginning, paniwala ko ito ay anti-Catholic, anti-poor, against life, laban sa pamilya.” (FROM THE BEGINNING, PINILI MO NA NA MAGING MAKASARILI. PINILI MO NA HUWAG BUKSAN ANG ISIP MO NA KAILANGAN MONG MALAMAN KUNG ANO ANG GUSTO NG MGA NASASAKUPAN MO. IKAW NA MISMO NAGSABI, FROM THE BEGINNING, SARILI MO LANG PANINIWALAAN MO.)
– Del Mar votes no: There’s something wrong when bill disrespects religious beliefs, reduces to plain argument denial of right to life (RELIGIOUS BELIEF NA NAMAN. PAKI-EXPLAIN NA LANG IN SCIENTIFIC FORM PLEASE.)
– Fortuno votes no “not on basis of morality or what Church, constituents say. I base vote on my knowledge of what ought to be.” (K. WHAT’S YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF OUGHT TO BE BA? SHARE MO NGA! NAGPAKA-VAGUE KA PA E ALAM NAMAN NA TAKOT KANG DI NA BOBOTOHIN ULIT E.)
– Garay votes no: I hold that choices related to bill conscience must not only be informed but rightly guided by teachings of faith (KUNG GANO’N, MGA KABABAYAN NATING MUSLIM NGA SANG-AYON SA RH E MALI ANG NAITURONG FAITH SA KANILA? NAGHAHANAP KA YATA NG GULO E.)
– Pablo Garcia votes no: Bill does not care much about family/marriage but concerned with giving couples safe,satisfying sex life (BINASA KAYA NITO ANG KABUUAN NG BILL? PERO KAHIT NA KABOBOHAN ETO, TINANONG KAYA NIYA ANG MGA NASASAKUPAN NIYA KUNG GUSTO NILA NG SAFE AND SATISFYING SEX LIFE?)
– Lucy Torres Gomez votes no: Proponents don’t regard conception as beginning of life — the core of my objection (ANO BA! FLUNK KA RIN YATA SA BIOLOGY. WALANG CONCEPTION KUNG WALANG FERTILIZATION NG OVUM BY THE SPERM, KUNG HINDI MAGME-MEET ANG OVUM AT ANG SPERM! WALANG CONCEPTION, WALANG BEGINNING OF LIFE, WALANG PINAPATAY ANG RH BILL! PAKI-ULIT NGA.)
– Gullas votes no: We stand for the yearning that somehow, some higher power binds us to follow the light to goodness, righteousness (NAGYE-YEARN KA PA PALA NA SOMEHOW MAKAKITA KA NG LIWANAG? DI KA PALA SIGURADO SA GOODNESS AT RIGHTEOUSNESS NA ALAM MO? DIYOS KO!)
– Javier votes no: We don’t play dice with God. ( ALAM NA ANG SUGAROL! AYAW LANG NI GOD MAKIPAGLARO SA ‘YO!)
– Lico votes no, says bill violates constitution, offend moral laws & conscience. (PAKI-EXPLAIN NGA ALING MORAL LAW AND CONSCIENCE MO ANG NA-OFFEND. TINANONG MO BA ANG NASASAKUPAN MO KUNG SUMASANG-AYON SILA SA KUNSIYENSIYA MO?)
– Rep. Mikey Arroyo votes no: Who stands to benefit most if this bill is passed? Hindi ko pwede isuko ang aking pagka-Katoliko (NANGUMPISAL KA NA BA NG TAOS-PUSO, MIKEY? IYONG KATOTOHANAN AT PAWANG KATOTOHANAN LANG? KUNG DI PA, MAGING TUNAY NA KATOLIKO KA MUNA BAGO MO SABIHIN NA DI MO PWEDENG ISUKO ANG PAGKA-KATOLIKO! IPOKRITO!)
– Ong votes no: This bill is against sanctity of human life. (BALIK KA SA HIGH SCHOOL. PAG-ARALAN MO ULI BIOLOGY MO.)
– Imelda Marcos votes no: Any law against natural law, the fundamental law of God is against God. (OK. TWO WORDS LANG: MARTIAL LAW)
– Paras votes no, dedicates vote to his mother & Mama Mary. “If RH bill was passed in the ’50s, I probably would not be here today.” (UNWANTED CHILD KA PALA. AYAW SIGURO NG NANAY MO MABUNTIS SIYA NOON, ANO? HUWAG MONG ISALI SI MAMA MARY DAHIL VIRGIN SIYA NG MABUNTIS. WHETHER SHE LIKES IT OR NOT, SIYA ANG PINILI PARA ISILANG SI HESUS!)
– Piamonte votes no: May provisions na labag sa aking konsensya, tulad ng sex education. My conscience vote is no. ( HINDI KUNSIYENSIYA MO ANG PINAG-UUSAPAN DITO! BOTO NG MAMAYAN MO ANG IBINOBOTO MO! KUNG HINDI MO PINAKINGGAN ANG MGA TAONG BUMOTO SA ‘YO, SAKA KA MAGPA-USIG SA KUNSIYENSIYA MO!)
– Rufus Rodriguez votes no: Bill directly violates fundamental law of the land, religious freedom; directly assaults Catholic Church ( KUNG HINDI ASSAULT SA CATHOLIC CHURCH, OK LANG? IYAN BA ANG DEFINITION MO NG RELIGIOUS FREEDOM?)
– Syjuco votes no, recites Apostles Creed as his constituents’ declaration of faith (HE SUFFERED UNDER PONTIOS PILATE, HE WAS CRUCIFIED AND WAS BURIED. PERIOD!)
– Tiangco: Sagot ba ang condom sa taong walang makain ngayon? ( PAGKAIN BA TINGIN MO SA CONDOM? NAGTATANONG LANG.)
– Unico votes no: Napakaswerte ko dahil nung kinasal ang magulang ko, walang RH law (ANO ANG KINALAMAN NG RH SA KASAL NG MAGULANG MO, ABER?)
– A. Yap votes no: Our close vote, rabid commenting on Facebook show how deeply divided we are. Why persist on measure that divide us? (DIVISION OF OPINION IS A SIGN OF HEALTHY DEMOCRACY. RABID COMMENTING ON FACEBOOK SHOWS THAT PEOPLE ARE ENGAGED ON THE ISSUE, YOUR VOTE IS THE VOTE OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS. WHAT DO THEIR OPINIONS SAY? DO YOU KNOW?)