Inside Philippine politics & beyond

G.I. Poe and other “action figures” in the 2016 presidential polls

Share:
LinkedIn0
Pinterest0

With Christmas coming, action figures will be the hottest items on sale.

Parents will agonize trying to find that one particular toy their children are wishing for.

For Filipino parents, Christmas will be agonizing in more ways than one. They will also have to decide which presidential candidate will make a difference in the future of their children.

To help parents make their momentous decision, my hubby Alan has this suggestion. Why not look at the presidential candidates as action figures and decide on that basis?

He wrote the following as a guide:

If candidates were action figures

Alan Robles

With the list of presidential candidates for next year’s election taking shape, it’s time to ask the REALLY serious question: If the candidates were action figures, which one would you collect?

Let’s look at the line-up so far

G.I. Poe – America’s number one commando is a cool and calculating heroine who can spot the opportunity to make her move. A charismatic figure skilled in the art of looking sincere and speaking with a level voice, G.I. Poe has a range of equipment and a commitment to do whatever it takes, even up to disavowing her loyalty to Uncle Sam. To help her, she can count on the Poes, a tough team of assorted dictator cronies, trapos and the occasional trapo who is a convicted child rapist.

To read the rest, please click on this link. 

Comments

  3. IN PARALLEL

    NASA global media conference is also underway. They are revealing somethings about the planet Mars.

    Revelation:
    I
    – Major Mars Findings
    It is not a dry planet! There is liquid/water in the planet.

    ‘Mars appears to have had flowing salty water’.

    Liquid water almost certainly in Mars.

    —
    http://www.nasa.gov/mars

  4. REAL WORLD

    Russian President Vladimir Putin up close

    —

    CBS’ 60 Minutes

    Putin says he’s not a “czar”

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/putin-says-hes-not-a-czar/

    —

    Russian Military Troops are now in Syrian Terriroty to support Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad.

    So it was with other western nations and their counter ‘terrorist militias’ wrestling control to dominate the whole of Syria. It has become a tinderbox of multinational invading forces to overthrow & assert its control on a sovereign nation and over its people.

  5. Rosemarie Sonora and Susan Roces who are sisters both disgruntled with the Marcoses and the military. Rosemarie was forced into concubinage by Marcos when she was still single. Rumours suggest that Grace was the infant who was left in the front porch of a church. I have four circumstantial evidences and one direct evidence that Sheryl is a Russian spy probably cultivated by her mother while she was young. One might suggest that Sheryl was but not Grace. But in the realm of espionage and basing them on the life story of the Soviet brothers, Walkers and his son, we cannot dispel the possibility that all of them are Russian moles. Russian intelligence operations always pin the disgruntled folk, so speak. They exploit their animosities until the disgruntled are caught in their trap who either do it out of patriotism or monies. The top 3 billionaires of USA are confirmed Russian spy. It is also possible that Fernando Poe was seduced by KGB using Susan Roces as the honey trap and at the same time using Rosemarie Sonora to pitch Ricky Belmonte. Now would we trust these kinds of people? If we cannot trust a Chinese spy named Jejomar Binay much more must not trust these Russian moles.

      • Nagkamali ba ako kay Binay? Nagkamali ba ako kay Arroyo? Did you drink something this morning? Raisa? Are you also an agent of influence of some spy agency? Are you closet NPA? You slant articles in their favour. Malamang nga may subversive intent ka. Kandidato ni Cristo si Mar. If God is with him, who else can be against him? – Bible.

        • No, I didnt drink something this morning.Im not a closet anything.

          If you are with Roxas, he doesnt need enemies.

          Blame your bushy eyebrows covering your eyes.

        • Alam mo bang ever since I posted this, I’ve been stalked by very very beautiful voluptuous Russian ladies. Naku ang gaganda. And I get 1 to 2 freebies every other day. That means I get laid. At virgins. Ang gaganda. Hayop ang mga binti. The nicest legs I’ve ever seen. That only meant they want me to shut up. After this circumstantial evidence of sleeping with ten and tens of Russian ladies wala na akong masabi kungdi I got bought. Tahimik na ako. You have the floor forever. Thank you for the freebies Putin,

        • A Terse Treatise on Anti-Satanism

          ——————————————————————————–

          A TERSE TREATISE ON ANTI-SATANISM
          (On Exculpations of Good Spies, Husbands, Wives and Kins)

          Canadian Security and Intelligence Service in its mission to secure public safety does not deserve baseless accusations that it has been riddled with corruption, nepotism, and gross incompetence. Bound by their craft ethics, mandatory and strict observance of the law imposed on them, a self-conscious oversight committee, a very watchful, everprying Inspector General, a dignified Solicitor General and an endlessly critical journalist named Andrew Mitrovica who has embarked on a scurrilously libelous “killing spree” have reinforced my honest convictions that it should be highly merited in accomplishin its avowed mission.

          Critics have considered it an affront on their basic rights if allegations of wrongdoing have surfaced through their media channels when the fact has been that they have never been substantiated. They have never been privy to relevant conversations inside the walls of their headquarters in Ottawa nor on their various offices located all over Canada. Nor have they been material witnesses to crimes imputed, completely ignorant on the laws of evidence, nor have they taken their time to browse through the pages of the sacred Criminal Code of Canada, nor be participants in courtroom procedures and hearings that have validated warrants of surveillance, hence lawful and binding. Inasmuch as there have been no valid court judgment against them in CSIS nor any pending lawsuits that have cast doubts on their integrity and veracities of their official statements; hence, I conclude that those claims by the stubborn and reckless critic Andrew Mitrovica were all unsubstantiated and all based on hearsay and gossip.

          I believe that allegations of felonies will not stand in court even though critics have been given their day. Take his case when he accused CSIS of warrantless prying after conniving with his protege, Mr. James Leigh who claimed that he was an Australian spy to sensationalize in newspapers accusations of not having been compensated for his “spying n the Liberal Party”/ What then can you make out of this story? What then would be the readers’ reaction on it when aroused with comments? Such impertinence does not only presume Macchiavellian tendencies. Not only were they prejudicial to interests of CSIS and violative of the laws on privacy and indictable under the Criminal Code of Canada. They compromised national security!!

          Either that Canadian diplomats lodge protests against Australia for being permissive of the alleged crimes of their foot soldiers or that our Prime Minister be forced to grant concessions perilous to national security and citizens’ safety. They can also render our formal complaints inutile under the menacing threat of an Australian diplomat’s bluff or “raising the ante” by way of placing their whole army on red alert.

          Aside from that different scenarios might prevail in their (Andrew Mitrovica and James Leigh) cabal. Either that Mr. Mitrovica be indicted as an accomplice in the crime of foreign espionage or for failure to report a crime. Associated with these are lawsuits on libel for implicating Australia’s spy agency in their “alleged crimes” committed on Canadian soil.

          It has been enshrined in our Charter of Rights as one of our stronger shields against commissions of grave injustices on the oppressed that “everyone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty”. As a sancrosanct rule, it should not to be trampled upon, tampered or else incur the feeble efforts and futile wrath of human rights activists in countries whose leaders habitually commit human rights violations.
          .
          Ridicule in whatever form as long as it has offended the decency and morals of civilized society and has been aimed with malice at any person like the ads “announcing an award to whoever deflowers Brian Mulroney’s daughter” has either been libelous or slanderous. Every Christian lady is enjoined by the Bible to remain chaste until she gets married. To expect her to surrender her virginity to any man especially below the age of consent was an obluquy.

          Statistics have shown that majority of those maligned victims of ridicule have been supposed to presumed innocent until proven guilty. It took several counts of libelous cartoons before Brian Mulroney was acquitted.

          With reference to non-related cartoons imputing other crimes or non-related libelous portrayal of convicted victims, the law states that “even the guilty person has rights under the law”. Nobody in his right mind would lampoon a man guilty of mischief by way of depiction as “a victim of sodomy as punishment for her or his crimes. I hope that Mr. Mitrovica realizes my point of contention.

          Even the Holy Bible has been amenable that “ridicule is the work of the devil” and that “the devil is a slanderer”. I have been reluctant to quote this passage to Mr. Mitrovica for being immaterial or irrelevant until I finally realized that he has been portraying CSIS evil. He is not God and He said, “thou shalt not judge and you shalt not be judged”.

          National security experts and advisers presumably will have advised that in this ideological campaign to “win the hearts and minds” of the Chinese, we have to take account of “political, diplomatic and most importantly security considerations which have been of vast importance.” (Morris Janowitz, The Professional Soldier, A Social and Political Portrait). We were advised to find ways and means to circumvent or steer clear of scandalous political situations which will imperil our nuclear free status. His accusation that Director Ward Elcock has been “soft-pedalling” to quote somebody or has been “de-emphasizing” issues on Chinese espionage are scandalous controversies we have to minimize. Insinuated warnings on him not to stubbornly and recklessly inflate the issue have not deterred him. If I were the Foreign Affairs then, exigencies would have caused me to travel in haste in China and “bow and pray” to the Chinese president setting aside ideological differences and remain practical or realistic.

          My position had been that published reports that the Chinese national referred to had already been indicted at the instance of CSIS lawyers and convicted “behind closed doors” so as not to create a scandal. An outstanding precept that “espionage has been no man’s land unless caught should had been Mitrovica’s or anybody’s code of conduct especially when Canada has been deemed to be the “Peaceful Kingdom”. Still, he has not dampened his desires to make a villain out of a protagonist director of CSIS,Ward Elcock.

          Even Mitrovica’s protege, John Farrell spied on postal unon workers when he was under the orbit of Canada Post. He was not employed by CSIS!! and the spying ceased when he was officially terminated from his duties in the postal corporation. When it ceased he was given bonafide duties to pass mail under valid warrants meticulously and judiciously obtained. Spying on postal union workers was not part and parcel of his employment contract. Besides. it should had been, was or will be irrelevant, unrelated, bootless, fruitless, inept, impractible, pointless and to quote a CSIS spokesman, “absurd”!! Notwithstanding, Mitrovica kept on writing, and writing, and writing …and….But he was not playing with fire. The fire has spread!

          Not contented with maligning people through scurrilous and libelous ridicule by silent complicity, apathy, again in his vindictiveness and hatred of CSIS, SIRC and the Privy Council, an unruly Mr. Mitrovica boisterously accused, yelled at and identified a CSIS employee with biting words and an accusative pointed finger in a 2000 Canadian Association for Security and Intelligence Studies Conference with “there is Dan…..”

          Breach of peace ( a crime under Canadian law) has been one of the causes that made him incredible and dubious same way as he implicitly used those grounds to implicate an honourable CSIS director who is presumed to be credible for reasons of stature. He passed the Canadian bar exams, took oath and was sworn into office. He has not been convicted of any crime. In addition, identifying a CSIS employee carries with it a maximum penalty of imprisonment of five years in prison.

          Organizing a hockey game or a beach volleyball game among CSIS men, ladies and *****s in venues where hamburgers roasted has been such trivial and harmless vices that were not pertinent issues in his indictment of CSIS, hence again, has discredited him. Rattling these matters in his book and opinion columns compel readers to have second thoughts on his hidden intentions. They have been harmless, proper and aligned with lawful activities listed in the Criminal Code. As a result, They have made the public cast written or oral comments that he has been “a desperate critic in need of gripes to design, formulate, improvise! Not only critics can have all the fun!!”

          Communist inflammatory and shouting slogans like “Agitate, agitate..” have been strategems to incite people to wage violent and armed struggles against legitimate governments. His remarks has been blatantly exhibited in a website, rabble.com. They were meant to inflame passions, rouse the rabble instead of persuading them through reasonable arguments or constructive criticisms.They were also defamatory tactics employed by violent communists in the Philippines and Al Qaeda terrorists. They were oftened referred to by members of churches of different denominations as misdeeds by “wolves in sheep’s clothings in their midst”. I do not know what prompted Mr. Mitrovica for the slip.

          Compare the sacrifices laid and the goodness of CSIS with the gravity of alleged offenses of slander and libel which can sully the reputation of all its members and a good director who dealt with Mr. Mitrovica in good faith after having been found of issuing requests to enforcement agencies to give him personal security in his suicidal brush with a powerful communist country. Compare those who have made absurd and ridiculous and unfounded accusations of and stories on CSIS with it’s poor recruits who cannot afford their education but inspite of penury are resourceful enough to spend their valuable time reading Supreme Court decisions and Canadian laws instead of mingling with potential national security risks like those animal rights and environmental activists, anti-globalization protesters, organizers of disruptive rallies, violent street demonstrations and those plotters of subverting a legitimate Canadian government.

          Intuition tells me that taking into consideration his above-mentioned inappropriate behaviour, thrown fits and tantrums in the workplace, and that due to his boorishness and heedless of proper etiquette, his complaints to an awards committee for not being nominated, acts that can raise serious concerns for employers and employees, I then conclude in accord with all the directors of CSIS that Mr. Cheney’s imputation that he is an “incorrigible a_h__” has grains of salt. Contemplate and examine yourself in the mirror, Mr. Mitrovica. Have you seen “the speck in your eyes..you see in the eyes of CSIS?

          Libel is a private crime. Mr. Farrell has an unquenchable appetite for money. His imputations might or might not have basis under the law. There were accusations which have not been substantiated nor corroborated. What if one disgruntled CSIS employee you mentioned in your book sues you for libel on one count? Another on two and spares Mr. Farrel to force him to deny his stories? And that his accusations “induced by avarice and monetary considerations” which were clearly stated in your book? What if one party “raises the ante” to forty thousand or let’s say a hundred capitalizing on John’s insatiety to contradict or repudiate them? Or a rich Chinese businesman, swayed and agonized by Elcock’s hapless situation, adds his share?

          “Journalism that chooses to inflame rather than inform is more destructive. It misses the point”. These have been found to be aggravating by articles and opinions that published those kind of unsubstantiated accusations. “Thoughtful public policy discussion is not just for wonks”. (Jim Travers, Toronto Star).

          What then made you appear delusional when you published your book aimed to stymie those of CSIS’s and it’s gifted lawyers” One,…”agitate, agitate..
          Second, ..”There is Dan…. And third…a unmeritorious award from a French separatist…Breach of peace…And so many many more.Pavlovian conditioning and cajolery by those mischievous lawyers finally worked on you. Thirty counts of unlawful identity closures can amount to 150 years in prison. Wish you get early parole if that happens.. So that you can “punch me in the nose”..Assault and battery..and many many more!

          Permission to publish this essay has been obtained. Copyright, Filipino CIA spy,2002

          I am Director of Operations, Philippine Security and Intelligence Service. Matakot kayo kay GracePoe. She can do anything perilous to all our lives. She will appoint NPAs.

        • UNWARRANTED AND BASELESS ACCUSATIONS
          Discovering discrepancies in official statements of persons expressing unwarranted and outrageous incriminating statements in public have placed some of their founders in extreme precarious situations. They have been considered by those authors of such public utterances as threats thus making the discoverers subject of scrutiny, victims of harrassment, provocations, malicious prosecutions and times, victims of murders or mayhem. The only reason has been that the intended victims of such slanderous statements have been completely vindicated in the eyes of the public.

          There have been documented cases that have shown these to be true. One sees them often in the newspapers. There have also been cases that have demonstrated what emboldened these principals of such atrocities. Maybe because the critics were once the least penurious and most ascetic in this supposedly civil society the majority of which have been aiming for the high stakes or the good life. They single out the weak and the hapless. They spare the mighty.

          Desperation in life has caused these perpetrators of these crimes to produce these baseless incriminating statements. It might have been that they found out the life has been useless or hopeless because of the quagmire they have been in. Psychologists describe these persons as people “always looking for trouble”. Moralists describe them as so very depraved that they want others to be like them or else suffer the consequences. Nonetheless, I have always given every criminal lawyer the benefit of the doubt. Yes, there might be rotten apples. But there have been very best ones aiming for the simple life, and those of truth, honesty and integrity minus the chicanery and mendacities of criminal defense lawyering. They either work for the Solicitor General’s Office of the Inspector Generals of CSIS(Canadian Security and Intelligence Service).
          It has been incumbent on any lawyer to defend his client. Whether guilty or not, it is imperative for the defense lawyer to object when the question to the client is irrelevant, imcriminating, leading, or immaterial. He sees to it that his or her rights has not been violated.

          But there have been times that they go to such extent that unmindful of what society’s critical impressions, they practice blatant duplicities, artifices and mendacities or what laymen calls as “double talk”. Nonetheless, I opine that chicanery and mendacities have been immaterial when criticizing a criminal lawyer named Rocco or giving what has been due him. Who am I to judge when I have only been a poor factory worker from the city named ______ and subject of slander, slights, and boorish remarks everywhere I go to. I am not God and I do it, too, in my lawyering.

          But….why “would CSIS or CIA aim their guns at you”, Rocco? If they can tolerate Andrew Mitrovica for numerous counts of allegedly libelous and slanderous statements, thirty counts of unlawful identity disclosures and his explicit premonitions of his “possible indictment under the Anti-Terrorist Act (“Guilty conscience does not need accusers”-PNP), and provisions for his personal security that shall redound to their mutual benefit, much more can they be lenient with an allegedly-once law abiding person like you. American law states that “it would be unlawful for them to carry out assassinations”. You have read that. Haven’t you?

          What CSIS has been fearing most has been that a disgruntled person with unattended gripes against these intelligence agencies makes a sacrificial lamb out of you and later places the blame on them.

          This might be remote. But what if one of your terrorist client’s victims still suffering on that lingering pain and out of vindictiveness puts the law on his hands and finish you off? As the primitive man says, “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”.

          What if one your Arab client’s peers uses you too as a tool. You just gave them a very cordial invitation. And that would aggravate the situation CSIS has now been in. Always the blame is on CSIS. “CSIS did it. CSIS is spying on me. CSIS is going to kill me, etc, etc, etc”

          You went straightaway in accusing the “US agency” instead of pinning the principal of the crime, the “third man from _____”!! You can easily suggest that because the “alleged has been on ______soil, his phone or the booth can be traced and his identity revealed on those surveillance cameras repleting on those lampposts. Thus if _____ police cannot produce the results with respect to your complaints, then maybe you have no valid case against the US agency or CSIS.

          Hammer your way into pinning the “third man from _____!!!!!!!” Do not cease until justice is served!! Go on!! Do it!!!

          Andrew Mitrovica with his thunderous and scandalous presences in the Globe and Mail has never elicited these kinds of death threat complaints against CSIS. But until when? His behaviour has been more impudent than yours. Hence, worthy of their animosities.

          I pray for you, Rocco. Fervently pray for you and hope that the good God saves you on the Day of Judgment and gives you a trillion more years to live. I pray for you!
          　
          HulingBaraha, journalist and national security expert, Virginia, USA

          ——————————————————————————–

        • Pumupusta ako ng $300 thousand dollars, ipapapatay ako ni Rosemarie Sonora at Susan Roces. Who wants to bet. I got exactly that amount.

        • Thank you too to you and Alan, SVR got threatened. I got laid. Of course I used condoms.

        • Hindi mo alam baka tinahi lang yung ___ ng chic to make it appear that she’s virgin. Tell your children to be careful of Russian ladies. They kill.

        • Dear CIA Spy – you forgot to take your meds again! You know what the doctor says will happen if you don’t take them. Wait, you say you ran out of money to buy the meds? I’m not surprised.

      • A Terse Treatise on Anti-Satanism

        ——————————————————————————–

        A TERSE TREATISE ON ANTI-SATANISM
        (On Exculpations of Good Spies, Husbands, Wives and Kins)

        Canadian Security and Intelligence Service in its mission to secure public safety does not deserve baseless accusations that it has been riddled with corruption, nepotism, and gross incompetence. Bound by their craft ethics, mandatory and strict observance of the law imposed on them, a self-conscious oversight committee, a very watchful, everprying Inspector General, a dignified Solicitor General and an endlessly critical journalist named Andrew Mitrovica who has embarked on a scurrilously libelous “killing spree” have reinforced my honest convictions that it should be highly merited in accomplishin its avowed mission.

        Critics have considered it an affront on their basic rights if allegations of wrongdoing have surfaced through their media channels when the fact has been that they have never been substantiated. They have never been privy to relevant conversations inside the walls of their headquarters in Ottawa nor on their various offices located all over Canada. Nor have they been material witnesses to crimes imputed, completely ignorant on the laws of evidence, nor have they taken their time to browse through the pages of the sacred Criminal Code of Canada, nor be participants in courtroom procedures and hearings that have validated warrants of surveillance, hence lawful and binding. Inasmuch as there have been no valid court judgment against them in CSIS nor any pending lawsuits that have cast doubts on their integrity and veracities of their official statements; hence, I conclude that those claims by the stubborn and reckless critic Andrew Mitrovica were all unsubstantiated and all based on hearsay and gossip.

        I believe that allegations of felonies will not stand in court even though critics have been given their day. Take his case when he accused CSIS of warrantless prying after conniving with his protege, Mr. James Leigh who claimed that he was an Australian spy to sensationalize in newspapers accusations of not having been compensated for his “spying n the Liberal Party”/ What then can you make out of this story? What then would be the readers’ reaction on it when aroused with comments? Such impertinence does not only presume Macchiavellian tendencies. Not only were they prejudicial to interests of CSIS and violative of the laws on privacy and indictable under the Criminal Code of Canada. They compromised national security!!

        Either that Canadian diplomats lodge protests against Australia for being permissive of the alleged crimes of their foot soldiers or that our Prime Minister be forced to grant concessions perilous to national security and citizens’ safety. They can also render our formal complaints inutile under the menacing threat of an Australian diplomat’s bluff or “raising the ante” by way of placing their whole army on red alert.

        Aside from that different scenarios might prevail in their (Andrew Mitrovica and James Leigh) cabal. Either that Mr. Mitrovica be indicted as an accomplice in the crime of foreign espionage or for failure to report a crime. Associated with these are lawsuits on libel for implicating Australia’s spy agency in their “alleged crimes” committed on Canadian soil.

        It has been enshrined in our Charter of Rights as one of our stronger shields against commissions of grave injustices on the oppressed that “everyone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty”. As a sancrosanct rule, it should not to be trampled upon, tampered or else incur the feeble efforts and futile wrath of human rights activists in countries whose leaders habitually commit human rights violations.
        .
        Ridicule in whatever form as long as it has offended the decency and morals of civilized society and has been aimed with malice at any person like the ads “announcing an award to whoever deflowers Brian Mulroney’s daughter” has either been libelous or slanderous. Every Christian lady is enjoined by the Bible to remain chaste until she gets married. To expect her to surrender her virginity to any man especially below the age of consent was an obluquy.

        Statistics have shown that majority of those maligned victims of ridicule have been supposed to presumed innocent until proven guilty. It took several counts of libelous cartoons before Brian Mulroney was acquitted.

        With reference to non-related cartoons imputing other crimes or non-related libelous portrayal of convicted victims, the law states that “even the guilty person has rights under the law”. Nobody in his right mind would lampoon a man guilty of mischief by way of depiction as “a victim of sodomy as punishment for her or his crimes. I hope that Mr. Mitrovica realizes my point of contention.

        Even the Holy Bible has been amenable that “ridicule is the work of the devil” and that “the devil is a slanderer”. I have been reluctant to quote this passage to Mr. Mitrovica for being immaterial or irrelevant until I finally realized that he has been portraying CSIS evil. He is not God and He said, “thou shalt not judge and you shalt not be judged”.

        National security experts and advisers presumably will have advised that in this ideological campaign to “win the hearts and minds” of the Chinese, we have to take account of “political, diplomatic and most importantly security considerations which have been of vast importance.” (Morris Janowitz, The Professional Soldier, A Social and Political Portrait). We were advised to find ways and means to circumvent or steer clear of scandalous political situations which will imperil our nuclear free status. His accusation that Director Ward Elcock has been “soft-pedalling” to quote somebody or has been “de-emphasizing” issues on Chinese espionage are scandalous controversies we have to minimize. Insinuated warnings on him not to stubbornly and recklessly inflate the issue have not deterred him. If I were the Foreign Affairs then, exigencies would have caused me to travel in haste in China and “bow and pray” to the Chinese president setting aside ideological differences and remain practical or realistic.

        My position had been that published reports that the Chinese national referred to had already been indicted at the instance of CSIS lawyers and convicted “behind closed doors” so as not to create a scandal. An outstanding precept that “espionage has been no man’s land unless caught should had been Mitrovica’s or anybody’s code of conduct especially when Canada has been deemed to be the “Peaceful Kingdom”. Still, he has not dampened his desires to make a villain out of a protagonist director of CSIS,Ward Elcock.

        Even Mitrovica’s protege, John Farrell spied on postal unon workers when he was under the orbit of Canada Post. He was not employed by CSIS!! and the spying ceased when he was officially terminated from his duties in the postal corporation. When it ceased he was given bonafide duties to pass mail under valid warrants meticulously and judiciously obtained. Spying on postal union workers was not part and parcel of his employment contract. Besides. it should had been, was or will be irrelevant, unrelated, bootless, fruitless, inept, impractible, pointless and to quote a CSIS spokesman, “absurd”!! Notwithstanding, Mitrovica kept on writing, and writing, and writing …and….But he was not playing with fire. The fire has spread!

        Not contented with maligning people through scurrilous and libelous ridicule by silent complicity, apathy, again in his vindictiveness and hatred of CSIS, SIRC and the Privy Council, an unruly Mr. Mitrovica boisterously accused, yelled at and identified a CSIS employee with biting words and an accusative pointed finger in a 2000 Canadian Association for Security and Intelligence Studies Conference with “there is Dan…..”

        Breach of peace ( a crime under Canadian law) has been one of the causes that made him incredible and dubious same way as he implicitly used those grounds to implicate an honourable CSIS director who is presumed to be credible for reasons of stature. He passed the Canadian bar exams, took oath and was sworn into office. He has not been convicted of any crime. In addition, identifying a CSIS employee carries with it a maximum penalty of imprisonment of five years in prison.

        Organizing a hockey game or a beach volleyball game among CSIS men, ladies and *****s in venues where hamburgers roasted has been such trivial and harmless vices that were not pertinent issues in his indictment of CSIS, hence again, has discredited him. Rattling these matters in his book and opinion columns compel readers to have second thoughts on his hidden intentions. They have been harmless, proper and aligned with lawful activities listed in the Criminal Code. As a result, They have made the public cast written or oral comments that he has been “a desperate critic in need of gripes to design, formulate, improvise! Not only critics can have all the fun!!”

        Communist inflammatory and shouting slogans like “Agitate, agitate..” have been strategems to incite people to wage violent and armed struggles against legitimate governments. His remarks has been blatantly exhibited in a website, rabble.com. They were meant to inflame passions, rouse the rabble instead of persuading them through reasonable arguments or constructive criticisms.They were also defamatory tactics employed by violent communists in the Philippines and Al Qaeda terrorists. They were oftened referred to by members of churches of different denominations as misdeeds by “wolves in sheep’s clothings in their midst”. I do not know what prompted Mr. Mitrovica for the slip.

        Compare the sacrifices laid and the goodness of CSIS with the gravity of alleged offenses of slander and libel which can sully the reputation of all its members and a good director who dealt with Mr. Mitrovica in good faith after having been found of issuing requests to enforcement agencies to give him personal security in his suicidal brush with a powerful communist country. Compare those who have made absurd and ridiculous and unfounded accusations of and stories on CSIS with it’s poor recruits who cannot afford their education but inspite of penury are resourceful enough to spend their valuable time reading Supreme Court decisions and Canadian laws instead of mingling with potential national security risks like those animal rights and environmental activists, anti-globalization protesters, organizers of disruptive rallies, violent street demonstrations and those plotters of subverting a legitimate Canadian government.

        Intuition tells me that taking into consideration his above-mentioned inappropriate behaviour, thrown fits and tantrums in the workplace, and that due to his boorishness and heedless of proper etiquette, his complaints to an awards committee for not being nominated, acts that can raise serious concerns for employers and employees, I then conclude in accord with all the directors of CSIS that Mr. Cheney’s imputation that he is an “incorrigible a_h__” has grains of salt. Contemplate and examine yourself in the mirror, Mr. Mitrovica. Have you seen “the speck in your eyes..you see in the eyes of CSIS?

        Libel is a private crime. Mr. Farrell has an unquenchable appetite for money. His imputations might or might not have basis under the law. There were accusations which have not been substantiated nor corroborated. What if one disgruntled CSIS employee you mentioned in your book sues you for libel on one count? Another on two and spares Mr. Farrel to force him to deny his stories? And that his accusations “induced by avarice and monetary considerations” which were clearly stated in your book? What if one party “raises the ante” to forty thousand or let’s say a hundred capitalizing on John’s insatiety to contradict or repudiate them? Or a rich Chinese businesman, swayed and agonized by Elcock’s hapless situation, adds his share?

        “Journalism that chooses to inflame rather than inform is more destructive. It misses the point”. These have been found to be aggravating by articles and opinions that published those kind of unsubstantiated accusations. “Thoughtful public policy discussion is not just for wonks”. (Jim Travers, Toronto Star).

        What then made you appear delusional when you published your book aimed to stymie those of CSIS’s and it’s gifted lawyers” One,…”agitate, agitate..
        Second, ..”There is Dan…. And third…a unmeritorious award from a French separatist…Breach of peace…And so many many more.Pavlovian conditioning and cajolery by those mischievous lawyers finally worked on you. Thirty counts of unlawful identity closures can amount to 150 years in prison. Wish you get early parole if that happens.. So that you can “punch me in the nose”..Assault and battery..and many many more!

        Permission to publish this essay has been obtained. Copyright, David Blinky,2002

  7. The mother of Chiz easily facilitated GPoe’s proclamation in UP because of her influence in the state university. Evie Escudero was a longtime member of the up alumni assn as well as university regent. Now a congresswoman from Bicol, she also got the franchise to operate a restaurant inside the campus that catered to well-heeled faculty members and students during her association with UP. Her late husband
    Sonny Escudero was dean of the veterinary medicine in the seventies who later was appointed agriculture secy by Pres. Marcos. Chiz while chairman of the senate education committee also occupied a regent’s post in a concurrent capacity. Thats how the UP authorities readily agreed to offer the bahay ng alumni as launching pad for Poe’s presidential ambition despite strong objections from various sectors of the UP community.

    • and how many of them did the oblation run? lest binay ran and showed his twinkie, he is forever in the hall of fame sa diliman, smiling. at saka, hindi pwedeng hawak ni grace-chiz ang UP, dahil maraming ka-frats si binay dyan, maraming boy scouts.

      • Your name can get you in jail for identity theft. I am betting 300 thousand dollars moonie you will got to jail for identity theft. Napaka demonyo mo. Pati pangalan ng bosing ko gamit mo para ma-fire ako. Demonyo. I am betting another 100 thousand dollars ikaw ang fired hindi ako. Kalabos ka. kuha pa nang boss ko lahat nang ariarian mo through garnishment. Demonyo and raiisa is an accomplice and abettor. Garnished din ang bahay niya

  8. For Vice President:

    Chiz-putin the Poe Whisperer – A suave and slick talking party animal (Party Pilipinas is my party, woo-hoo!). Capable of 120 words per minute when talking, giving the impression he is smart since many Filipinos cannot follow the train of thought that fast in English. Capable of supporting one half of a cause, like in Noy-Bi. A trapo disguised as a young man in white.

    Accessories:

    1. Hottie wife with a battalion of yayas
    2. Billlionaire ninongs who made their pile during the Marcos era and will collect favors soon
    3. Talking device that enables him to speak fast, impressing many dumb Filipinos who equate fast talking with intelligence